Standpoint Theory Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2250 words

rack Theory - Essay ExampleStandpoint Theory provides epistemic advantage for different academic fields, when informants/characters are empowered to accurately discuss and analyze their affable positions, so that they can change the status quo and improve their social status, although the theory moldiness also address its conceptual and methodological weaknesses to become a dependable resource for libber epistemology.Sandra Harding describes the governmental commitments of Standpoint Theory and devil sources of controversial views in Standpoint Theories Productively Controversial. She argues that the political commitments of Standpoint Theory are 1) the daily lives of the oppressed provide a richer standpoint for social compendium than the experiences of the privileged 2) standpoint theorists study up because they deconstruct the realities and needs of the underprivileged 3) the theory publicises collective achievement in understanding how social relations go bad and 4) the t heory seeks to obtain data that is accurate, exhaustive, objective, and intersectional (Harding 194-195). Furthermore, the two sources of controversial principles are the changing political agenda of feminists and the clash of different disciplines and their related epistemology and ontology (Harding 196-197). Harding argues that feminists must see Standpoint Theory from a contextualized multidisciplinary view and accept plurality as a legitimate source of different understandings, and not as a limitation to feminist analysis (Harding 198). She concludes that Standpoint Theory has a significant role in diverse science fields because it emphasizes attention on distressful social realities and cross-grained social relations. This article is important in discussing the controversies that undercut the intersectional value of Standpoint Theory. It has the weakness of poor empirical testing of its analyses through applying Hardings propositions to womens gatherings.... Harding argues t hat feminists must see Standpoint Theory from a contextualized multidisciplinary view and accept plurality as a legitimate source of different understandings, and not as a limitation to feminist analysis (Harding 198). She concludes that Standpoint Theory has a significant role in diverse science fields because it emphasizes attention on troubling social realities and uneven social relations. This article is important in discussing the controversies that undercut the intersectional value of Standpoint Theory. It has the weakness of poor empirical testing of its analyses through applying Hardings propositions to womens groups. Elizabeth Anderson criticizes Lisa Schwartzmans Challenging Liberalism (2006) in Toward a Non-Ideal, Relational Methodology for Political Philosophy Comments on Schwartzmans Challenging Liberalism. Anderson agrees with Schwartzmans positive agenda of political philosophy, specifically the latters standpoint methodology and group relations methodology. She affir ms that Schwartzman is right in her criticisms of individualism and abstraction too because they are incompatible with group relations methodology and standpoint methodology, respectively (Anderson 131). On the contrary, Anderson disagrees with Schwartzmans view on liberalism. Anderson argues that liberalism is consistent with Schwartzmans methods because liberals have used them and liberal normative commitments promote the use of these methods (Anderson 131). Anderson contends that liberalism is based on a level of timidity on the capability of the state in resolving all injustices, especially considering differences in how spate see what is good in their operations of informal social values (131). The